Google Pixel 9 vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 9 (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $799 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 50/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,561,427); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 143); the Google Pixel 9 is noticeably lighter (198g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 by 27 points (77/100 vs 50/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9
Performance 25
Display 100
Camera 75
Battery 33
Design 52
Value for money 55
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Google Pixel 9 better?
  • Lighter: 198g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $799 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (52/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1561427
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4900
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 27W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 27 points higher (77/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 33/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (92/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (51/100 vs 33/100). In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 9: The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for everyday use.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1561427 3942923
Geekbench Single 1850 3640
Geekbench Multi 4900 11033
Display 6.3" Actua OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2424x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 27W 68W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 143 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 198 g 285 g
Price $799 $1799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
75
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9
  • 6.3" Actua OLED
  • Resolution: 2424x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 15W
33
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4
50/100
1561427 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100 +60.4%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 9 by 60.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9
$799
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Price difference: $1000. Google Pixel 9 is cheaper by $1000.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (92/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (91/100 vs 75/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (51/100 vs 33/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 9 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (52/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 9 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 by 27 points (77/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 75/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.