Google Pixel 8a vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 65/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,433,693); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 136); the Google Pixel 8a is noticeably lighter (188g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8a — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 8a

Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 52

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Google Pixel 8a better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1799

  • Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (57/100 vs 52/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 39/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 18 points higher (83/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8a — 52/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8a and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (68/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 8a Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 1433693 3057215
Geekbench Single 1722 2833
Geekbench Multi 4458 9119
Display 6.1" OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 68W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 136 164
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IPX9
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 188 g 285 g
Launch price $499 $1799

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 8a

  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +53.1%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 8a by 53.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 8a

$499

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $1300. Google Pixel 8a was $1300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (90/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8a and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (91/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (68/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 8a is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8a — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.