Google Pixel 3a XL vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 3a XL (2019) runs on the Snapdragon 670, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $479 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 27/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 322,015); the Google Pixel 3a XL is noticeably lighter (167g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL by 64 points (91/100 vs 27/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 3a XL
Performance 26
Display 56
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 76
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel 3a XL better?
  • Lighter: 167g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $479 vs $950

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 322015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 381
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1239
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 3a XL vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 64 points higher (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Google Pixel 3a XL — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (99/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 3a XL: The Google Pixel 3a XL is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 3a XL Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 670 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 322015 4247433
Geekbench Single 381 3640
Geekbench Multi 1239 11033
Display 6.0" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2160 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 Pie Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 160.1×76.1×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 167 g 230 g
Launch price $479 $950
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • 6.0" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2160
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
56
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
15
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 3a XL and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 3a XL Snapdragon 670
27/100
322015 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +92.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 3a XL by 92.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 3a XL
$479
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $471. Google Pixel 3a XL was $471 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (99/100 vs 26/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (89/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (85/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL by 64 points (91/100 vs 27/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 3a XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 3a XL has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 3a XL over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 3a XL is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.