Google Pixel 3a vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Google Pixel 3a (2019) runs on the Snapdragon 670, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $399 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 27/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 322,015); the Google Pixel 3a is noticeably lighter (147g vs 230g).
Google Pixel 3a
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 147g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $950
- Better portability (81/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 322015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 381
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1239
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 26/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 59/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 3a vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 64 points higher (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Google Pixel 3a — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (99/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (85/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 3a | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 670 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 322015 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 381 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1239 | 11033 | |
| Display | 5.6" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2220 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 151.3×70.1×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 147 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $950 |
Google Pixel 3a
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Google Pixel 3a
- 5.6" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2220
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 3a
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Google Pixel 3a and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 3a by 92.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $551. Google Pixel 3a was $551 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (99/100 vs 26/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (89/100 vs 59/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a (85/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a by 64 points (91/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 3a and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 3a has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 3a or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 3a over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 3a is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.