Google Pixel 3 XL vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Google Pixel 3 XL (2018) runs on the Snapdragon 845, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 34/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3430); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 595,284); the Google Pixel 3 XL is noticeably lighter (184g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL by 57 points (91/100 vs 34/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 3 XL
Performance 41
Display 66
Camera 10
Battery 18
Portability 70
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel 3 XL better?
  • Lighter: 184g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $950

  • Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 595284
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 563
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2006
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3430 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 3 XL vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 57 points higher (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 18/100). Value score: Google Pixel 3 XL — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (85/100 vs 18/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3 XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).

Google Pixel 3 XL: The Google Pixel 3 XL is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 3 XL Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 595284 4247433
Geekbench Single 563 3640
Geekbench Multi 2006 11033
Display 6.3" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1440x2960 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3430 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 5W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 158.0×76.7×7.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 184 g 230 g
Launch price $899 $950
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 3 XL
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 3 XL
  • 6.3" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1440x2960
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
66
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 3 XL
  • 3430 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 5W
18
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 3 XL and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 3 XL Snapdragon 845
34/100
595284 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +86.0%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 3 XL by 86.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 3 XL
$899
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $51. Google Pixel 3 XL was $51 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (99/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (89/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL (85/100 vs 18/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3 XL significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 3 XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3 XL by 57 points (91/100 vs 34/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 3 XL and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 3 XL has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 3 XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 3 XL or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 3 XL over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 3 XL is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.