Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $999 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads — 73/100 vs 69/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,870,000); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3041
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $999 vs $2899
- Better camera (86/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (58/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1870000
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro scores 4 points higher (73/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (58/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (63/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1870000 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $999 | $2899 |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 36.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1900. Apple iPhone 16 Pro is cheaper by $1900.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (63/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.