Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600; launch prices were $999 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads — 73/100 vs 66/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has the bigger battery (4300 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,347 vs 1,782,199); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3235
- Faster charging: 27W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1099
- Better camera (86/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113347 vs 1782199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10904 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 4300 vs 3582 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 85/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro scores 7 points higher (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (37/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro — 56/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 42/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 1782199 | 3113347 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3235 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 10904 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 1080x2520 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1080x2520
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 42.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Apple iPhone 16 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (86/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (93/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.