Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 45/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 593,307); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 204g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 26 points higher (71/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (68/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 593307 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2299 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y77 (China) and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 54.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (68/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) by 26 points (71/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.