Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 38/100 vs 29/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 194g vs 200g
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 9 points higher (38/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (50/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (50/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (50/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 38/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for everyday use.