Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 37/100 vs 11/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (41/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (47/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 26 points higher (37/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (47/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 65W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 26 points (37/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (41/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for everyday use.