Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 45/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 593,307); the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 pro
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Lighter: 194g vs 199g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 13 points higher (58/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 593307 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2299 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y77 (China) and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 41.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably better than the Vivo Y77 (China) — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.