Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) doesn't.
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Lighter: 188g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 51/100)
- Faster charging: 65W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (47/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro edges out the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (41/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for everyday use.