Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Avid 589
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 6/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 8 MP.
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Avid 589
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 167g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (91/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (11/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Avid 589 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Avid 589 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 156818 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 723 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | — | 2GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 167 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Avid 589
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Avid 589
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Avid 589
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Avid 589 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (91/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the ZTE Avid 589 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 6/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Avid 589 is a better fit for everyday use.