Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Avid 589
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 19/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 177,554).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Avid 589
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 15/100)
What makes ZTE Avid 589 better?
- Lighter: 167g vs 179g
- Better display (42/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Vivo Y32t scores 9 points higher (28/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Avid 589 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (52/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Avid 589 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 723 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | — | 2GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 167 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Avid 589
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Avid 589
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Avid 589
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y32t and ZTE Avid 589, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads ZTE Avid 589 by 70.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Avid 589 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (52/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the ZTE Avid 589 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 19/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Avid 589?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 15/100).