Vivo Y31s 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Vivo Y31s 5G (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 90/100 vs 47/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6500); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 560,863); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y31s 5G doesn't.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G by 43 points (90/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y31s 5G
Performance 47
Display 55
Camera 37
Battery 58
Portability 50
Value for money 56
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 91
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 92
What makes Vivo Y31s 5G better?
  • Lighter: 207g vs 219g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $999

  • Better portability (50/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 560863
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2249
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
  • Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo Y31s 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 43 points higher (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Vivo Y31s 5G — 56/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 92/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (98/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y31s 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Vivo Y31s 5G: The Vivo Y31s 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo Y31s 5G Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 560863 3998145
Geekbench Single 923 3640
Geekbench Multi 2249 11033
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 2160 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 44W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 159
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16, HyperOS 3
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.2×75.4×8.4 mm 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm
Weight 207 g 219 g
Launch price $200 $999
Camera comparison
Vivo Y31s 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Vivo Y31s 5G
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
91
display
Battery and charging
Vivo Y31s 5G
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo Y31s 5G and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo Y31s 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
47/100
560863 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
90/100 +86.0%
3998145 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo Y31s 5G by 86.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y31s 5G
$200
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
$999

Launch price difference: $799. Vivo Y31s 5G was $799 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (98/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (91/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (87/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G (89/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y31s 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y31s 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31s 5G by 43 points (90/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo Y31s 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Vivo Y31s 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y31s 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y31s 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Vivo Y31s 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Vivo Y31s 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.