Vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 81/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,037,992); the Vivo X300 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Lighter: 206g vs 224g
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $892
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3037992
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3352
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10402
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 6 points higher (87/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Vivo X300 — 84/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (87/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3037992 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3352 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10402 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | $892 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo X300 by 23.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $393. Vivo X300 was $393 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (87/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) edges out the Vivo X300 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 has a MobileRank rating of 81/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.