Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE Blade A52
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A52 (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 34/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the ZTE Blade A52 is noticeably lighter (214g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
ZTE Blade A52
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 35/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A52 better?
- Lighter: 214g vs 230g
- Overall rating 34/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the ZTE Blade A52, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 57 points higher (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A52 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | ZTE Blade A52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A52
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A52
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A52
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A52
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (89/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A52 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 by 57 points (91/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A52?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the ZTE Blade A52 — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the ZTE Blade A52?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.