Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo Y32
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y32 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 45/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo Y32
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo Y32 better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 229g vs 230g
- Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Vivo Y32, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 46 points higher (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Vivo Y32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 720x1592 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 169.6×79.2×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1592
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo Y32
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 by 46 points (91/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Vivo Y32 — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.