Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Vivo Y32
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y32 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 45/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7400); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Vivo Y32
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 227g vs 229g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (35/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo Y32 better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7400 mAh
- Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs the Vivo Y32, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 44 points higher (89/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Vivo Y32 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | Vivo Y32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 4602290 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1592 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7400 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | 169.6×79.2×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y32
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1592
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y32
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (92/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Vivo Y32 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 by 44 points (89/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo Y32 — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra over the Vivo Y32?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.