Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Vivo X200 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,825,187).

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Vivo X200 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Pro
Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 84
Battery 76
Portability 43
Value for money 76
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Vivo X200 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 223g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $950

  • Better portability (43/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2825187
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2866
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9980
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 84/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X200 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 84/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Pro — 76/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X200 Pro: The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X200 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2825187 4247433
Geekbench Single 2866 3640
Geekbench Multi 9980 11033
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2800x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / Funtouch OS 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.4×76.0×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 223 g 230 g
Launch price $799 $950
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
84
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:47 hrs, total 24:55 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 30W
76
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X200 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X200 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9400
82/100
2825187 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +33.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X200 Pro by 33.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X200 Pro
$799
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $151. Vivo X200 Pro was $151 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 84/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Vivo X200 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 84/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X200 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.