Vivo iQOO 16 vs Vivo X200 Pro
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Vivo X200 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400; launch prices were $840 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 82/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 2,825,187).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Vivo X200 Pro
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 2825187
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2866
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 9980
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $840
- Better camera (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the Vivo X200 Pro, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 7 points higher (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 76/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100, Vivo X200 Pro — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | Vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | 2825187 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 2866 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 9980 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 / Funtouch OS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 162.4×76.0×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X200 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo X200 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:47 hrs, total 24:55 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO 16 and Vivo X200 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Vivo X200 Pro by 94.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $41. Vivo X200 Pro was $41 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Vivo X200 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 edges out the Vivo X200 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Vivo X200 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo X200 Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Vivo X200 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Pro leads on camera score (84/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Vivo X200 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the Vivo X200 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.