Vivo S60 Vitality vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Vivo S60 Vitality (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 63/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S60 Vitality has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 1,099,769).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo S60 Vitality
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Vivo S60 Vitality better?
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 196g vs 204g
- Longer battery life (70/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 1099769
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1089
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 3276
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo S60 Vitality vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 8 points higher (71/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality leads (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Vivo S60 Vitality (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo S60 Vitality | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1099769 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1089 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3276 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2750 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×74.3×7.8 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo S60 Vitality
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo S60 Vitality and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Vivo S60 Vitality by 15.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Vivo S60 Vitality (86/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Vivo S60 Vitality by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo S60 Vitality has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S60 Vitality over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo S60 Vitality is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.