Vivo S60 Vitality vs ZTE Axon 40
The Vivo S60 Vitality (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S60 Vitality leads — 62/100 vs 58/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S60 Vitality has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo S60 Vitality is faster in AnTuTu (1,176,492 vs 1,010,069).
Vivo S60 Vitality
ZTE Axon 40
- Higher AnTuTu: 1176492 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3783 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (62/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (70/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 53/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1130
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (51/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Vivo S60 Vitality vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Vivo S60 Vitality scores 4 points higher (62/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality leads (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Vivo S60 Vitality | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1176492 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1130 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3783 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1260x2750 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×74.3×7.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo S60 Vitality
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo S60 Vitality and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo S60 Vitality leads ZTE Axon 40 by 16.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (85/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (70/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo S60 Vitality edges out the ZTE Axon 40 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo S60 Vitality has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S60 Vitality over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo S60 Vitality is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.