Vivo iQOO Z11x vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

The Vivo iQOO Z11x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $170 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 54/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,207,005 vs 1,214,772); the Xiaomi 17T Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z11x doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably lighter (190g vs 205g).

The Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x by 28 points (82/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Z11x
Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 56
Portability 60
Value for money 78
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 63
Battery 87
Portability 54
Value for money 76
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11x better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 205g
  • Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $899

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 54/100)
  • Higher value score: 78/100 vs 76/100
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3207005 vs 1214772
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z11x vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 28 points higher (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (63/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100).

Vivo iQOO Z11x: The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17T Pro: The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo iQOO Z11x Xiaomi 17T Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1214772 3207005
Geekbench Single 1061 3228
Geekbench Multi 3185 9553
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 44W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 190 g 205 g
Launch price $170 $899
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Z11x and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Z11x MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
54/100
1214772 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +62.1%
3207005 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Vivo iQOO Z11x by 62.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z11x
$170
Xiaomi 17T Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $729. Vivo iQOO Z11x was $729 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (93/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (63/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (87/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x by 28 points (82/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z11x over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.