Vivo iQOO Z11x vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Vivo iQOO Z11x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $170 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 88/100 vs 54/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,593,401 vs 1,214,772); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z11x doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z11x is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x by 34 points (88/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Z11x
Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 56
Portability 60
Value for money 78
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11x better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $999

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3593401 vs 1214772
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3185
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 44W

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
  • Higher value score: 88/100 vs 78/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z11x vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 34 points higher (88/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (96/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).

Vivo iQOO Z11x: The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo iQOO Z11x Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1214772 3593401
Geekbench Single 1061 3640
Geekbench Multi 3185 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 44W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 3500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 190 g 226 g
Launch price $170 $999
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Z11x
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Z11x and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Z11x MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
54/100
1214772 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +66.2%
3593401 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Z11x by 66.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z11x
$170
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
$999

Launch price difference: $829. Vivo iQOO Z11x was $829 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (96/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (93/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x (80/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11x notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11x by 34 points (88/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z11x and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Z11x or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z11x over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Z11x is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.