Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14T Pro

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; launch prices were $548 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 14T Pro leads — 78/100 vs 75/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 2,129,644); the Xiaomi 14T Pro is noticeably lighter (209g vs 225g).

The Xiaomi 14T Pro edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi 14T Pro

Performance 82
Display 93
Camera 69
Battery 79
Portability 49
Value for money 70

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 2129644
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2249
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 7352
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $649

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 82/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)

What makes Xiaomi 14T Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Lighter: 209g vs 225g

  • Better camera (69/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (49/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 14T Pro, the Xiaomi 14T Pro scores 3 points higher (78/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro leads (69/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 14T Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (69/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14T Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 14T Pro: The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi 14T Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
AnTuTu 3579952 2129644
Geekbench Single 3293 2249
Geekbench Multi 10243 7352
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 2712x1220
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 135
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm 160.4×75.1×8.4 mm
Weight 225 g 209 g
Launch price $548 $649

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
69
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 14T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
78/100 -68.1%
2129644 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Xiaomi 14T Pro by 68.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi 14T Pro

$649

Launch price difference: $101. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $101 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (69/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14T Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?

The Xiaomi 14T Pro edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 14T Pro — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?

The Xiaomi 14T Pro leads on camera score (69/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 14T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.