Vivo iQOO 15T vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 46/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 SE is noticeably lighter (182g vs 216g).
Vivo iQOO 15T
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (65/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 216g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15T vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 36 points higher (82/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (75/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (74/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 15T | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3815522 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | — |
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (65/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (75/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (74/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE by 36 points (82/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15T and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15T has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15T over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.