Vivo iQOO 16 vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 46/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 SE is noticeably lighter (182g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
ZTE Axon 40 SE
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 SE better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 223g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 43 points higher (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (74/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 SE
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (90/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (74/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE by 43 points (89/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.