Vivo iQOO 15 vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 46/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 SE is noticeably lighter (182g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 15
ZTE Axon 40 SE
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 SE better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 215g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 40 points higher (86/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (85/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (74/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 15 | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3758268 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 SE
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (85/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (74/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE by 40 points (86/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15 has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.