Tecno Spark 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Tecno Spark 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $160 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 45/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 576,015); the Tecno Spark 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro by 46 points (91/100 vs 45/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
Performance 44
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 59
Portability 64
Value for money 62
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Tecno Spark 50 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $160 vs $950

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 576015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2014
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 46 points higher (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 59/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 50 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (85/100 vs 59/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).

Tecno Spark 50 Pro: The Tecno Spark 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Spark 50 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 576015 4247433
Geekbench Single 727 3640
Geekbench Multi 2014 11033
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1612 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 60W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 167.8×79.2×7.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Launch price $160 $950
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • No wireless charging
59
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Spark 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Spark 50 Pro MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate
45/100
576015 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +86.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 50 Pro by 86.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
$160
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $790. Tecno Spark 50 Pro was $790 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (89/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (85/100 vs 59/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 Pro by 46 points (91/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Spark 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Spark 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.