Tecno Spark 50 4G vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Spark 50 4G (2026) runs on the Helio G81, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $139 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 39/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 4G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 358,383); the Tecno Spark 50 4G is noticeably lighter (210g vs 226g).
Tecno Spark 50 4G
Vivo X300 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $899
- Better portability (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 4G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 48 points higher (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 55/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 50 4G — 56/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 4G | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Helio G81 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.8×79.2×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $899 |
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 4G
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Spark 50 4G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Spark 50 4G by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $760. Tecno Spark 50 4G was $760 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (93/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (84/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G (81/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 4G by 48 points (87/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 4G and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Spark 50 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 50 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 50 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 4G over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Spark 50 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.