Tecno Spark 40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $150 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 46/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 575,630); the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Spark 40 Pro better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $150 vs $950
- Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Spark 40 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 45 points higher (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 66/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 575630 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.9×6.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $150 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Spark 40 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 40 Pro by 86.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $800. Tecno Spark 40 Pro was $800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (89/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (96/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (85/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro by 45 points (91/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 40 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 40 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.