Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $230 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 52/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5160); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Lighter: 156g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $280
- Better portability (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 19 points higher (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (88/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (35/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (100/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Tecno Pova Slim by 79.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $50. Tecno Pova Slim was $50 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (88/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (35/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (73/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (100/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Slim — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.