Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $450 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 71/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Lighter: 193g vs 212g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $450
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 2 points higher (73/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (73/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (66/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 38.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $170. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ was $170 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (88/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (81/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (73/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (66/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.