Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Pova 7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 879,714); the Tecno Pova 7 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $950
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Tecno Pova 7 Pro — 68/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×75.9×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova 7 Pro by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $700. Tecno Pova 7 Pro was $700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (96/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Pro by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.