Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $250 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 53/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 573,460); the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova 6 Pro better?
- Lighter: 198g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $899
- Better portability (61/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 35 points higher (88/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Tecno Pova 6 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (61/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 6 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.5×76.1×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova 6 Pro by 82.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $649. Tecno Pova 6 Pro was $649 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (94/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (81/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (61/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro by 35 points (88/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.