Tecno Camon iACE2 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon iACE2 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 22/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3050); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon iACE2 doesn't; the Tecno Camon iACE2 is noticeably lighter (150g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon iACE2
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon iACE2 better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 226g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3050 mAh
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon iACE2 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 66 points higher (88/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon iACE2 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 10243 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 150 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 3050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon iACE2 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon iACE2 by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon iACE2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (94/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (84/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon iACE2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 by 66 points (88/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon iACE2 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon iACE2 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon iACE2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon iACE2 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.