Tecno Camon 50 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 50 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $180 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Camon 50 is noticeably lighter (201g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 50 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 201g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $899
- Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6150 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 — 70/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50
- 6150 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $719. Tecno Camon 50 was $719 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (94/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (58/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.