Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 63/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 210g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 61
Battery 58
Portability 74
Value for money 80
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 92
Portability 49
Value for money 90
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
  • Lighter: 178g vs 210g
  • Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $400

  • Better camera (61/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 1030590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 13 points higher (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (61/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (74/100 vs 49/100).

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Camon 50 Ultra Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1030590 3154662
Geekbench Single 1061 3041
Geekbench Multi 3185 9494
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm
Weight 178 g 210 g
Launch price $249 $400
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless charging: no data
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
63/100
1030590 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100 +67.3%
3154662 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
$249
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
$400

Launch price difference: $151. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $151 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (61/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (74/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.