Tecno Camon 40 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 575,630).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 40 better?
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 575630 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 by 86.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.