Tecno Camon 40 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 51/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 575,630).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 40 better?
- Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 37 points higher (88/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 575630 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.6×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 40 by 82.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (94/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (81/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 by 37 points (88/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.