Tecno Camon 17 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio G95, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 46/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 535,127); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 17 Pro better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 226g
- Better portability (47/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 535127
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 672
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1908
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 42/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 17 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (88/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 17 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G95 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 535127 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 672 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1908 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 48 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.9×77.0×9.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 48MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 17 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 17 Pro by 83.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (94/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (84/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (96/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro by 42 points (88/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 51/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 17 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.