Tecno Camon 16 S vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 16 S (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 29/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 177,554); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 S doesn't; the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 16 S
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 16 S better?
- Overall rating 29/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 38/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 16 S vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 59 points higher (88/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (84/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 16 S | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×76.5×9.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 16 S
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 16 S and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 16 S by 94.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 16 S
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (94/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (84/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (96/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S by 59 points (88/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 S and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 16 S has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 S over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.