Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 15 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 15 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $2899 and $771. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 69/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 15 Pro has the bigger battery (6100 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 15 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,995,695 vs 2,926,532); the Xiaomi 15 Pro is noticeably lighter (213g vs 309g).

The Xiaomi 15 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

Xiaomi 15 Pro

Performance 91
Display 90
Camera 78
Battery 80
Portability 46
Value for money 80

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2798
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 69/100

What makes Xiaomi 15 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2995695 vs 2926532
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10104 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 6100 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 213g vs 309g
  • Cheaper at launch: $771 vs $2899

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (46/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Xiaomi 15 Pro, the Xiaomi 15 Pro scores 14 points higher (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro leads (80/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Xiaomi 15 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (46/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 15 Pro: The Xiaomi 15 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Xiaomi 15 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2926532 2995695
Geekbench Single 3013 2798
Geekbench Multi 9287 10104
Display 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2160x1584 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 6100 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 15 / HyperOS 2
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm 161.3×75.3×8.4 mm
Weight 309 g 213 g
Launch price $2899 $771

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Xiaomi 15 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Xiaomi 15 Pro

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Xiaomi 15 Pro

  • 6100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Xiaomi 15 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100
2926532 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
83/100 +2.3%
2995695 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 15 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 2.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Xiaomi 15 Pro

$771

Launch price difference: $2128. Xiaomi 15 Pro was $2128 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (46/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 15 Pro?

The Xiaomi 15 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Xiaomi 15 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 15 Pro — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 15 Pro?

The Xiaomi 15 Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Xiaomi 15 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 15 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.