Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 13 Lite
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 13 Lite (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; launch prices were $2899 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 54/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 840,330); the Xiaomi 13 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 42/100)
- Faster charging: 67W vs 45W
- Lighter: 171g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $2899
- Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Xiaomi 13 Lite, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 15 points higher (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 42/100, Xiaomi 13 Lite — 46/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Xiaomi 13 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 840330 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1039 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2885 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 159.2×72.7×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 171 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $400 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Xiaomi 13 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Xiaomi 13 Lite by 248.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $2499. Xiaomi 13 Lite was $2499 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (63/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13 Lite — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 13 Lite — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 13 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.