Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 45/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 593,307); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 194g vs 309g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (69/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2299 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 393.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (90/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (63/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) by 24 points (69/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.