Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y30
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y30 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 25/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y30 doesn't; the Vivo Y30 is noticeably lighter (197g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y30
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 828
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 13/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo Y30 better?
- Lighter: 197g vs 309g
- Better portability (49/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y30, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 44 points higher (69/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (90/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (70/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (52/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y30 (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 828 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 162.0×76.5×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 197 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y30
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y30
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y30
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo Y30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo Y30 by 1369.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y30
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (90/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (70/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 (52/100 vs 13/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y30 (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y30 by 44 points (69/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo Y30 — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 13/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y30?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.