Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo V70 Lite
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo V70 Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo; launch prices were $2899 and $299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 57/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo V70 Lite has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 953,150); the Vivo V70 Lite is noticeably lighter (186g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo V70 Lite
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 953150
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo V70 Lite better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 186g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (71/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo V70 Lite, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 12 points higher (69/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo V70 Lite — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo V70 Lite (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo V70 Lite is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo V70 Lite (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V70 Lite is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V70 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo V70 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.8×76.3×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $299 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo V70 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V70 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo V70 Lite
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo V70 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo V70 Lite by 207.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2600. Vivo V70 Lite was $2600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo V70 Lite (90/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo V70 Lite is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo V70 Lite (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V70 Lite is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V70 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo V70 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Vivo V70 Lite — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V70 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo V70 Lite — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo V70 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo V70 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo V70 Lite?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.