Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo S50 Pro mini
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $2899 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads — 71/100 vs 57/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 Pro mini has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S50 Pro mini is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo S50 Pro mini is noticeably lighter (191g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 2903
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 57/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 9300
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 191g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $485 vs $2899
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (62/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the Vivo S50 Pro mini scores 14 points higher (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini leads (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo S50 Pro mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9602 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 191 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $485 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo S50 Pro mini
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo S50 Pro mini leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 4.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2414. Vivo S50 Pro mini is cheaper by $2414.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (61/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Vivo S50 Pro mini leads on camera score (62/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.