Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 33/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 175g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | — | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 66W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 175 g | |
| Price | $2899 | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 24 points (57/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.