Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 54/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 971,424); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 971424
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1167
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2577
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 175g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 15 points higher (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 971424 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1167 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2577 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 66W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 201.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (90/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (63/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.