Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 971,424); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

Performance 57
Display 79
Camera 40
Battery 44
Portability 80
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 971424
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1167
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2577
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 66W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 175g vs 214g

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (80/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7200
AnTuTu 3463142 971424
Geekbench Single 3601 1167
Geekbench Multi 10686 2577
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 60W 66W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157 —
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm
Weight 214 g 175 g
Launch price $1299 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3463142 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7200
54/100 -256.5%
971424 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 256.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (96/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (86/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (61/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (80/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.